Corporate identity
Existence, company name, RFC and consistency of the data received.
Human and actionable screening to confirm corporate identity, review main public signals and decide if it proceeds, proceeds with conditions, should be escalated or should be stopped.
✓New client requesting moderate credit
✓Supplier before a first order or advance payment
✓Firm or advisor that needs a traceable filter
✓Team that must decide in one business day
We do not confuse quantity of sources with depth. Each module responds to the decision, is documented and then connected to the others.
Existence, company name, RFC and consistency of the data received.
Category and date of relevant tax listings, penalties and other alerts available.
Bounded sweep with identity validation; comprehensive national judicial coverage is not promised.
Operational footprint, red flags and specific triggers to go deeper.
Fictional scenario constructed to explain the method. It does not contain data from a real person or company.
A supplier requests an advance payment of $90,000.
The company exists, but the RFC of the listing corresponds to another company name and the declared address does not coincide with the visible presence.
The problem is not an isolated coincidence: it is not clear which entity will collect and assume the obligation.
Stop the advance until the documentation is corrected or escalated to Counterparty DD.
The report is designed to be read by the decision maker, retained as evidence of the process and shared with advisors when appropriate.
Know the deliverablesA platform can locate data quickly. Zarur Legal Insights validates identity, explains materiality, makes boundaries visible, and turns signals into a documented recommendation.
Yes. The Company Check identifies the triggers and questions that justify moving to Counterparty DD.
No. It means that no signals were located within the sources, coverage and date reviewed.
We confirm scope and indicate the necessary information to get started.