Sample report · dummy data

Counterparty commercial due diligence

This sample reproduces the structure and logic of the deliverable. The final scope changes depending on the product, the decision, the available sources and the file.

ZARUR LEGAL INSIGHTSCOUNTERPARTY DECISION INTELLIGENCE
SAMPLE · FICTITIOUS DATA

Commercial Counterparty DD · Company

Supplies Delta Industrial, S.A. of C.V. (fictitious entity)

Reference
CDD-2026-014 · SAMPLE
Decision
Define conditions for an advance payment of $250,000 MXN and annual contract.
Cut date
August 28, 2026
01
EXECUTIVE DECISION

Executive decision

Do not proceed under the proposed conditions. The company operates and the identity is confirmed, but the powers of the signatory do not match the power provided and there are signs that increase the risk of liquidity and recovery. The transaction may be reconsidered with milestones, a lower advance and corrected representation.

CertaintyCorroborated
MaterialityMaterial risk
CoverageAdequate
02
CONDITIONS TO PROCEED

Conditions to proceed

  1. Provide current and sufficient power of the signatory.
  2. Reduce the advance payment to 20% and release payments against verifiable deliverables.
  3. Request guarantee or proportional additional retention.
  4. Review concentration and operational capacity before renewing the line.
03
MATERIAL FINDINGS

Material finds

01

Unaccredited faculties

Data
The power provided does not include the signatory of the proposal or the required powers.
Find
The representation to commit the company is not accredited.
Implication
It may compromise enforceability, claims and payment control.
Action
Do not sign or pay until you receive and validate the correct instrument.
02

Accumulated signs of recovery

Data
Recent commercial litigation and security interests related to the entity were located.
Find
The facts individually do not prove insolvency; Taken together they justify caution about liquidity and priority.
Implication
A high down payment without milestones concentrates risk before receiving value.
Action
Reduce initial exposure, split payments and document mitigations.
03

Observable operation

Data
Address, activity and commercial references are reasonably consistent.
Find
There is observable operational capacity for the general purpose of the contract.
Implication
Supports conditional continuity, but does not neutralize previous alerts.
Action
Validate specific capacity against the contracted volume.
04
EVIDENCE MATRIX

Evidence Matrix

HypothesisSource/supportStatusTrust
Existence and RFCCommercial registry / SAT / documentsConfirmedHigh
RepresentationContributed powerinsufficientHigh
Commercial litigationAvailable judicial sourcesCorroboratedMedium
Movable guaranteesRUGCorroboratedHigh
Operational capacityDocuments, references and open sourcesConsistentMedium
05
LIMITATIONS

Limits and reservations

  • The absence of findings does not prove absence of risk; reflects only the coverage, cutoff date and sources described.
  • Nominal matches are excluded or kept open when there is insufficient evidence to attribute them to the subject.
  • This report supports a human decision. It does not replace specialized legal, tax, accounting or financial advice.
  • Judicial coverage depends on jurisdictions and available systems; It does not constitute an exhaustive national search.
  • No private credit information was consulted nor was a solvency opinion issued.
Zarur Legal Insights · Illustrative sampleCDD-2026-014 · SAMPLE