Short answer
What you should know before deciding
A helpful review connects existence, powers, capacity, tax status, litigation, and verifiable experience.
Essential points
- Validate the exact entity and who it signs.
- Relates capacity to the promised service.
- Check references and relevant background.
- Scale the depth according to amount and risk.
01
Define the risk of contracting
A smaller supply does not require the same depth as a critical supplier with access to facilities, data or advances. Amount, continuity, regulation and substitution determine the scope.
02
Check the counterparty
Company name, RFC, address, registration acts and representative must be consistent. Confirm that the bank account, invoice and contract correspond to the reviewed entity.
03
Capacity and trajectory
Contracts, personnel, infrastructure, certifications and references must be related to the service. A business presentation is not a substitute for verifiable evidence.
04
External sources
Review tax publications, relevant litigation, bankruptcy proceedings, public procurement, sanctions and intellectual property when the profile warrants it.
05
Decision matrix
Classifies facts, uncertainties and mitigating factors. It may be recommended to ask for guarantees, adjust payments, limit access, perform a test or require clarifications; Not every discovery requires rejection.
Practical application
What to check and what to ask
Useful documents or evidence
- Sufficient identifiers to avoid homonyms.
- Complete and legible documents related to the purpose.
- Evidence of the source, date of consultation and status of the result.
- Clarifications and supports provided by the person investigated.
Control questions
- What decision should this review inform?
- What evidence confirms the data?
- What limits should be expressed?
Frequent errors
- Search without a defined purpose.
- Confusing a coincidence with a confirmed fact.
- Ignore date, source or status of the result.
Official sources consulted
Scope and limits of this information
This content is educational and does not constitute legal advice for a specific case. A match does not confirm identity; a lawsuit is not equivalent to a sentence; a publication must be read in its state and date; The absence of findings only describes the sources reviewed and does not guarantee absence of risk.
Availability, coverage and updating of records vary. Before making a material decision, allow clarification, preserve evidence and request specialized advice when the result depends on a legal, fiscal, registry or contractual interpretation.
Next step
Business investigation
ZLI verifies sources, reduces homonyms, and documents facts, boundaries, and points to clarify.
Request supplier investigation →